SURVEY DESIGN
Knowing what the client wants is the key factor to
success in any type of business. News media, government agencies and political
candidates need to know what the public thinks. Associations need to know what
their members want. Large companies need to measure the attitudes of their
employees. The best way to find this information is to conduct a survey.
The Steps in a Survey Project
Following are the
main steps involved in a survey building project.
Establishing Goals
The first step in any survey is deciding what we want
to learn. The goals of the project determine whom we will survey and what we
will ask them. If our goals are unclear, the results will probably be unclear.
Some typical goals include learning more about:
·
The potential market for a new product or service
·
Ratings of current products or services
·
Employee attitudes
·
Customer/patient satisfaction levels
·
Reader/viewer/listener opinions
·
Association member opinions
·
Opinions about political candidates or issues
·
Corporate images
These sample goals represent general areas.
The more specific we can make our goals, the easier it will be to get usable
answers.
Selecting Sample
There are two main components in determining whom we
will interview. The first is deciding what kind of people to interview.
Researchers often call this group the target population. If we conduct
an employee attitude survey or an association membership survey, the population
is obvious. If we are trying to determine the likely success of a product, the
target population may be less obvious. Correctly determining the target
population is critical. If we do not interview the right kinds of people, we
will not successfully meet our goals.
The next thing to decide is how many people we need
to interview. Statisticians know that a small, representative sample
will reflect the group from which it is drawn. The larger the sample, the more
precisely it reflects the target group. However, the rate of improvement in the
precision decreases as our sample size increases. For example, to increase a
sample from 250 to 1,000 only doubles the precision. We must make a decision about
our sample size based on factors such as: time available, budget and necessary
degree of precision.
Interviewing
Methods
Once we have decided on our sample we must decide on
our method of data collection. Each method has advantages and disadvantages.
Personal Interviews
An interview is called personal when the Interviewer
asks the questions face-to-face with the Interviewee. Personal interviews can
take place in the home, at a shopping mall, on the street, outside a movie
theatre or polling place, and so on.
Advantages
·
The ability to let the Interviewee see, feel and/or taste a
product.
·
The ability to find the target population. For example, we
can find people who have seen a film much more easily outside a theatre in
which it is playing than by calling phone numbers at random.
·
Longer interviews are sometimes tolerated. Particularly with
in-home interviews that have been arranged in advance. People may be willing to
talk longer face-to-face than to someone on the phone.
Disadvantages
·
Personal interviews usually cost more per interview than
other methods. This is particularly true of in-home interviews, where travel
time is a major factor.
·
Each mall has its own characteristics. It draws its
clientele from a specific geographic area surrounding it, and its shop profile
also influences the type of client. These characteristics may differ from the
target population and create a non-representative sample.
Telephone Surveys
Surveying by telephone is a popular interviewing
method.
Advantages
·
People can usually be contacted faster over the telephone
than with other methods. If the Interviewers are using CATI (computer-assisted
telephone interviewing), the results can be available minutes after completing
the last interview.
·
We can dial random telephone numbers when we do not have the
actual telephone numbers of potential respondents.
·
CATI software, such as The Survey System, makes complex
questionnaires practical by offering many logic options. It can automatically
skip questions, perform calculations and modify questions based on the answers
to earlier questions. It can check the logical consistency of answers and can
present questions or answers choices in a random order (the last two are
sometimes important for reasons described later).
·
Skilled interviewers can often elicit longer or more
complete answers than people will give on their own to mail, email surveys
(though some people will give longer answers to Web page surveys).
Interviewers can also ask for clarification of unclear responses.
·
Some software, such as The Survey System, can combine survey
answers with pre-existing information we have about the people being
interviewed.
Disadvantages
·
Many telemarketers have given legitimate research a bad name
by claiming to be doing research when they start a sales call. Consequently,
many people are reluctant to answer phone interviews and use their answering
machines to screen calls. Since over half of the homes in the USA have answering machines,
this problem is getting worse.
·
The growing number of working women often means that no one
is home during the day. This limits calling time to a "window" of
about 6-9 p.m. (when we can be sure to interrupt dinner or a
favourite TV program).
·
We cannot show or sample products by phone.
Mail Surveys
Advantages
·
Mail surveys are among the least expensive.
·
This is the only kind of survey we can do if we have the
names and addresses of the target population, but not their telephone numbers.
·
The questionnaire can include pictures - something that is not
possible over the phone.
·
Mail surveys allow the respondent to answer at their
leisure, rather than at the often inconvenient moment they are contacted for a
phone or personal interview. For this reason, they are not considered as
intrusive as other kinds of interviews.
Disadvantages
·
Time! Mail surveys take longer than other kinds. We
will need to wait several weeks after mailing out questionnaires before we can
be sure that we have gotten most of the responses.
- In populations of lower educational and literacy levels, response rates to mail surveys are often too small to be useful. This, in effect, eliminates many immigrant populations that form substantial markets in many areas. Even in well-educated populations, response rates vary from as low as 3% up to 90%. As a rule of thumb, the best response levels are achieved from highly-educated people and people with a particular interest in the subject (which, depending on our target population, could lead to a biased sample.
Computer Direct Interviews
These are interviews in which the Interviewees enter
their own answers directly into a computer. They can be used at malls, trade
shows, offices, and so on. The Survey System's optional Interviewing
Module and Interview Stations can easily create computer-direct
interviews. Some researchers set up a Web page survey for this purpose.
Advantages
·
The virtual elimination of data entry and editing costs.
·
We will get more accurate answers to sensitive questions.
Recent studies of potential blood donors have shown respondents were more
likely to reveal HIV-related risk factors to a computer screen than to either
human interviewers or paper questionnaires. The National Institute of Justice
has also found that computer-aided surveys among drug users get better results
than personal interviews. Employees are also more often willing to give more
honest answers to a computer than to a person or paper questionnaire.
·
The elimination of interviewer bias. Different interviewers
can ask questions in different ways, leading to different results. The computer
asks the questions the same way every time.
·
Ensuring skip patterns are accurately followed. The Survey
System can ensure people are not asked questions they should skip based on
their earlier answers. These automatic skips are more accurate than relying on
an Interviewer reading a paper questionnaire.
·
Response rates are usually higher. Computer-aided
interviewing is still novel enough that some people will answer a computer
interview when they would not have completed another kind of interview.
Disadvantages
·
The Interviewees must have access to a computer or one must
be provided for them.
·
As with mail surveys, computer direct interviews may have
serious response rate problems in populations of lower educational and literacy
levels. This method may grow in importance as computer use increases.
Email Surveys
Email surveys are both very economical and very fast.
More people have email than have full Internet access. This makes email a
better choice than a Web page survey for some populations. On the other hand,
email surveys are limited to simple questionnaires, whereas Web page surveys
can include complex logic.
Advantages
·
Speed. An email questionnaire can gather several
thousand responses within a day or two.
·
There is practically no cost involved once the set up has
been completed.
·
We can attach pictures and sound files.
·
The novelty element of an email survey often stimulates
higher response levels than ordinary “snail” mail surveys.
Disadvantages
·
We must possess (or purchase) a list of email addresses.
·
Some people will respond several times or pass
questionnaires along to friends to answer. Many programs have no check to
eliminate people responding multiple times to bias the results. The Survey
System’s Email Module will only accept one reply from each address sent the
questionnaire. It eliminates duplicate and pass along questionnaires and checks
to ensure that respondents have not ignored instructions (e.g., giving 2
answers to a question requesting only one).
·
Many people dislike unsolicited email even more than
unsolicited regular mail. We may want to send email questionnaires only to
people who expect to get email from we.
·
We cannot use email surveys to generalize findings to the
whole populations. People who have email are different from those who do not,
even when matched on demographic characteristics, such as age and gender.
·
Email surveys cannot automatically skip questions or
randomize question or answer choice order or use other automatic techniques
that can enhance surveys the way Web page surveys can.
Internet/Intranet (Web Page) Surveys
Web surveys are rapidly gaining popularity. They have major speed, cost, and flexibility
advantages, but also significant sampling limitations. These limitations make software selection
especially important and restrict the groups we can study using this technique.
Advantages
·
Web page surveys are extremely fast. A questionnaire
posted on a popular Web site can gather several thousand responses within a few
hours. Many people who will respond to an email invitation to take a Web
survey will do so the first day, and most will do so within a few days.
·
There is practically no cost involved once the set up has
been completed. Large samples do not cost more than smaller ones (except
for any cost to acquire the sample).
·
We can show pictures. Some Web survey software can
also show video and play sound.
·
Web page questionnaires can use complex question skipping
logic, randomizations and other features not possible with paper questionnaires
or most email surveys. These features can assure better data.
·
Web page questionnaires can use colours, fonts and other
formatting options not possible in most email surveys.
·
A significant number of people will give more honest answers
to questions about sensitive topics, such as drug use or sex, when giving their
answers to a computer, instead of to a person or on paper.
·
On average, people give longer answers to open-ended
questions on Web page questionnaires than they do on other kinds of
self-administered surveys.
·
Some Web survey software, such as The Survey System, can
combine the survey answers with pre-existing information we have about
individuals
taking a survey.
taking a survey.
Disadvantages
·
Current use of the Internet is far from universal. Internet surveys do not reflect the
population as a whole. This is true even
if a sample of Internet users is selected to match the general population in
terms of age, gender and other demographics.
·
People can easily quit in the middle of a
questionnaire. They are not as likely to
complete a long questionnaire on the Web as they would be if talking with a
good interviewer.
·
If our survey pops up on a web page, we often have no
control over who replies - anyone from Antarctica to Zanzibar, cruising that web page
may answer.
·
Depending on our software, there is often no control
over people responding multiple times to bias the results.
Scanning Questionnaires
Scanning questionnaires is a method of data
collection that can be used with paper questionnaires that have been
administered in face-to-face interviews; mail surveys or surveys completed by
an Interviewer over the telephone. The Survey System can produce paper
questionnaires that can be scanned using Remark Office OMR (available from CRS).
Other software can scan questionnaires and produce ASCII Files that can be read
into The Survey System.
Advantages
·
Scanning can be the fastest method of data entry for paper
questionnaires.
·
Scanning is more accurate than a person in reading a properly
completed questionnaire.
Disadvantages
·
Scanning is best-suited to "check the box" type
surveys and bar codes. Scanning programs have various methods to deal with text
responses, but all require additional data entry time.
·
Scanning is less forgiving (accurate) than a person in
reading a poorly marked questionnaire. Requires investment in additional
hardware to do the actual scanning.
Basic Steps for conducting Survey
The following are the basic steps for conducting a
survey:
1) Determine the objectives of the survey. Arrange
meetings, discussions with senior executives for whom the survey is to be
conducted.
2) When the objectives of the survey were pre-determined
and provided by the sponsoring agency, it is still necessary to hold meetings
with the responsible officers in order to seek clarification.
3) There should be mutual agreement between the chief
executives of the sponsoring agency and the survey team prior to finalization
for research methodology.
4) Preparation of research methodology with sufficient
details about each part, so that an action oriented to control the activities
of researchers within given time and cost is possible.
5) Preparation of Questionnaire: There are two basic
goals in designing a questionnaire for any study, to collect information relevant
to the determined objectives of the study and to collect this information with
maximum reliability and validity.
6) Pre-testing: Pre-testing is a technique of examining
the workability or accuracy of the questionnaire, before starting to collect
the data from the sample. This step is taken before the preparation of the
final questionnaire/interview schedule to be used.
7) Sampling: There are numerous methods and techniques
of sampling. In case of homogenous population a smaller percentage of samples
will suffice, whereas, a heterogeneous population may demand a stratified
sampling. While drawing a stratified sample it is better to give higher
representation to smaller strata as compared to larger stratum.
8) Data collection: Selection of Field Assistants/Interviews:
Personal characteristics: Keeping in view the characteristics of the population
under study, age, education, ethnic background and personal appearance of the
candidate be given top consideration.
9) Training: As there is no universally standard survey or
interview; there can be no standard training programme. The intensity and
nature of training will depend on the size of the interviewers, past
experience, type and size of the questionnaire and the time and money
available. Thus, the time required for training may range from one day to four
days.
10) Problems:
location of the sample unit: the location of the sample is very important task
for the supervisors as well as interviewer. The wrong selection of the sample
will not fulfill the objective of the survey. The validity and accuracy of the
data will certainly depend upon the right approach to the sample as instructed
by the supervisors and project incharge.
11) Field problem:
interviewers often face the following problems:-
-
Peoples’
suspicion
-
No proper place
for interviewing, disturb the interviewers.
-
Contracting
leader is difficult in case of clashes.
-
Lack of ability
to know language of the respondents.
-
Non co-operation
from the respondents.
12) Field Supervision: the role of field supervisor is
also of great importance. It is therefore, necessary that the supervisor should
be the full-time, experienced, and preferably the senior members of the
research organization. In order to accomplish the cited task efficiently, the
supervisors should be sober, experienced, polite and responsible type of
person. They should be provided with all the necessary facilities.
13) Quality Control: a daily check of the completed
questionnaire followed by a prompt discussion between the supervisor and the
interviewers concerned will ensure better quality right from the beginning. In
absence of a real foolproof method of checking for quality control, it is
possible only to avoid such situations by a categorically making it clear to
the interviewers during the training that various checks will be made on their
work on various stages in order to maintain an acceptable standards.
14) Data processing: The following are the major steps
which are normally followed while processing data manually:
Ø
Preparation of
an editing plan for checking and verifying.
Ø
Coding and
filling interview schedules.
Ø
Interview
schedules are verified from sample unit.
Ø
The filled in
interview schedules examined for legibility.
Ø
Prepare a coding
key for all questions.
Ø
Each question is
given a code number.
Ø
Due care to
responses from the respondent.
Ø
Transfer whole
data on the coding sheet.
Ø
Simple and
contingency tables are prepared.
Ø
Group data by
tally method will be presented.
Ø
In simple &
cross tables data presented-characteristics/variable-wise.
15) Problems
of Data Processing: There are some problems of data processing, which need to be dealt with due care.
16) Writing Research Report :
Ø
Prepare a
comprehensive Outline.
Ø
Use tables,
tables, charts, graph and pictures to show relationship.
Ø
Use simple
language.
Ø
Be objective in
presenting the research findings.
Ø
Effective
communication of results.
Ø
Distinguish
between technical and popular reporting.
Observational Method:
In survey research, it has been often complained that the interviewer
has to contact respondents in every day activities and occupations. The
respondent may, therefore, not co-operate whole-heartedly in spite of his good
intentions because some other matters or obligations may bother him at the time
of giving interview. In observational method, this disadvantage is not there.
The observer is able to conduct his study without disturbing the respondent and
is able to study the behavior of a particular respondent over even a long
period of time.
Importance of Observational Method:
According to Mr. Bailey, observation is decidedly superior to survey
research as well as experimentation in collecting data on non-verbal behavior.
If we compare survey method with observational method, there are a few
advantages of the observational method:
·
Observational
method is superior to collect information about non-verbal behavior.
·
The researcher
observes the behavior in its natural environment
Observational Method for Collecting Primary Data:
There are a number of situations where observational research method
provides more relevant information. Observation technique has been used to
collect such information where the overt human behavior can be observed by the
trained researcher. The main quality of observation method is that the personal
elements can be reduced to the minimum. While in personal interviews the
personal elements of the interviewer as well as that of the respondent cannot
be controlled to the same extent as in the case of observation techniques.
In observation method, even mechanical devices can be used to observe
the behavior. It is a definite advantage that mechanical measuring and
recording devices have greater degree of reliability. Human senses and
judgments are used in observation and even in experimentation but the
systematic procedures followed in these two techniques of data collection have
a definite advantage. In a number of developing countries, business and social
researchers are making use of observational and experimental techniques in
primary data collection.
Certain
advantages of the observation techniques may be listed; human error can be
reduced; mechanical devices can secure more accurate data; observations may be
made of actual, real conditions of occurrences; little effort and expense
occurs in checking the results of observations.
No comments:
Post a Comment